UK 61 UA 51

January 25, 2009 by  
Filed under Basketball

It was another ugly half. Meeks was having to fight and claw for everything, Patterson was pretty much no where to be found, and other Cats were again being put in a position to step up. And they were not. The Alabama game plan was simple. Try to restrict Patterson’s touches, assign a guy to Meeks full time, and don’t worry much about anyone else. We are used to seeing people attempt to limit Patterson’s touches. What we haven’t been used to is seeing people actually do it until the last few games. We are also not used to seeing Patterson out worked on the boards as he has at times, and it happened again in the first half. Giving up offensive rebounds, turning the ball over and poor execution by anyone other than Meeks pretty much tells the tale of the first half.

Then halftime came. And this half time was nothing close to ordinary. The half ran longer than normal, then it was announced that a Cat had collapsed during the half. Turns out, it was Harris. Also, no coach at the start of the half and the first thought was that there wouldn’t be a coach sighting in the second half. But, as things usually do work themselves out, coach did reappear. That pretty much told me that Harris was doing OK. His status was, and at the moment is, still a mystery but at least the young man is home safe and sound. And in times like these, basketball is nothing compared to the health of a player.

Perry Stevenon has picked up the slack

Perry Stevenon has picked up the slack

Coach had hinted that he may change his substitution pattern around. I understood why he had not before and I understand why he thinks it might be time to now. Harris and Porter do give you everything they have but they are limited in what they can offer. And Porter didn’t have a bad game. But with all the focus on Meeks and Patterson, its very easy for me to link the forced play trying to get them shots directly with many of the turnovers. The problem to date has been that guys like Miller and Liggins are also limited but in different ways and for different reasons. And their limitations to date have far outweighed Porter and Harris. But as that gap closes, UK needs to reach a point where they rely more on Liggins and Miller, because UK will need some of the added skills they can offer if they are not hurting UK in other areas as much. And yesterday, in the second half, we saw the result of this change in thought by coach. Miller, out of necessity due to Harris, but also Liggins out of necessity simply because UK needs to be able to make plays by guys other that Patterson and Meeks. Consider it done. Meeks did get his. He always does. Miller didn’t do anything flashy, but he did provide solid D, some great passing and solid play that helped get UK into an open court game. Liggins did provide some needed scoring and overall good D. The major contribution came from Stevenson who, in my opinion had a monster second half and was the key to the game.

I don’t know what is going on with Patterson. I know he has a sore finger, but six points, five boards, two turnovers ZERO assists and five PFs is NOT a Patterson game even if he didn’t have a hand. This is a guy that rarely got in foul trouble last year but it is the case this year. I know he’s the focus of defenses, and I know the team is going to Meeks as much as possible, but he has to keep his head in the game. And I think the others like Porter, Harris (if possible), Miller and Liggins need to make teams pay for showing so much attention to Patterson. They get open shots, and this team will not rise to the next level until those guys knock down those shots.

But, UK continues to plow forward. No one thought it would be as easy as the first two games and it certainly has not. And in the big picture, UK will enter the top 25 on Monday, has total command of the SEC. It’s on to Ole Miss. Go Cat!

UK 73 UA 64

January 22, 2009 by  
Filed under Basketball

1:41 That is a time to remember. That is the time left on the clock in the first half when the one and only moving pick call was made on UA. And that simply amazes me. I hardly ever complain about how a game is called, but the moving picks from UA were so blatant and across the board that I am floored three grown men standing on the floor couldn’t see it. They weren’t the lean in kind. They weren’t the get there late and not be set up kind. They were the wait till the offensive player who is using the scree goes by then play offensive lineman by continuing to move your feet to stay in front of a guy type. Some coaches teach it I guess because UA performed it to perfection and only got dinged once for it. Alrighty, I spoke my piece on it, I am done..

As for UK, the bodies showed up but they left their heads somewhere else. It was across the board, aside for maybe Stevenson. Porter, Meeks, Harris and Patterson were equally inept, to go along with the typical ineptness of Liggins. I actually liked Miller in this game, but his D just isn’t where it needs to be. Of course I am sure the boards will be filled with Porter hate, and probably some Harris hate as all those who said neither would ever amount to much and wish to be “right” get to blow their horns. I think there should be a rule that if you can’t acknowledge when a kid does good things, then you can’t bang on them when they screw up, so people should be glad I’m not the one making up the rules. BUT, I have been in Porter and Harris’ corner all along (I’m actually in every cat’s corner) so I get to bust them good. It starts with Porter, who had his head firmly planted up somewhere else. One of his intangibles of late has been to supply the steadying force on the floor. That went way out the window last night. Harris followed suit and looked like it was the first time he’s ever stepped on a college floor. Patterson and Meeks were just as bad, but when your role is to score, people tend to give you a break. Not me. Those two deserve to run the stairs until they fall down. If you wish to be the corner stones of this team, you must take more than your share when you don’t bring it like you should. People worried the Georgia game could have been a trap game. turns out, it was UA.

Turnovers, turnovers turnovers. They continue to plague this team. And the UA game showed the worst kind which are the fumble, bumble not trying to do the right thing kind. Its one thing to make a bad pass when you are trying to run a set. Stuff happens. But its quite another thing to just drop the ball in traffic, throw it somewhere no one expects you to throw it, or dribble off your own leg. This team can be very good, but they have got to learn how to value the ball. And I am not giving UA credit for those turnovers. It was all on the Cats.

So what did go right? Stevenson. Easily my player of the game. Yeah, Meeks got 31 and Patterson got 21 and 18. But Stevenson was the only one that I thought was actually into the game. Stevenson had some turnovers as well, but three of them should not have been called. Most probably did not even notice his game. He had to guard both at the basket and away from the basket. He had to usually guard a smaller guy, which typically means a quicker guy. Not when you are talking Stevenson. That could be a major match up problem for other teams. But it becomes a match up problem in favor of UK when Stevenson is on the floor because UK makes you pay by taking full advantage of Stevenson’s length. That, to me, was the difference in UK being 4-0 or being 3-1 in the SEC.

Liggins. If Porter played so poorly, and he certainly did, why did Liggins not get more time? Because he played much worse. His problems continue on the defensive end, and they start with those picks. Not just in this game, but in every game save three. Players usually note a pick and either fight high or low, depended on what D is called. Liggins is like a fly to fly paper when it comes to screens. He is tractor beamed right into the middle of the screen and sticks to it like glue, leaving the other defender to have to decide at the time make a switch that is only supposed to happen for a split second. Instead, Liggins is STILL stuck to the screen. That could very well be the one and only reason he doesn’t get more time. That and he seems to think you aren’t doing anything if you aren’t jacking up shots even if they are not in the flow and you shouldn’t be taking them. He’s staying in front better now, but he has got to figure out how to handle screens properly. And he has got to understand that his primary job should be to make others better on the floor. And stop jacking up 17 % shots.

All in all, I guess this is one more sign that this team is, in fact, getting better. In the recent past, the margin for error was so slim that to play as they did last night would have been a double digit loss to a lesser team than UA. As it is, it was a nine point W and the game wasn’t really in doubt coming down the stretch. And I never really felt like the game was ever in doubt in the first place. But the Cats will not be able to get away with this type of an effort come Saturday.

UK 70 Vandy 60

January 11, 2009 by  
Filed under Basketball

Did anyone wonder what would happen if UK hosted Vandy, Ogilvy had to sit out with a bum heal, and 2 Pat would pretty much take the day off? I didn’t. But if you did you now know the outcome. And to UK’s credit, it had enough to step up, make adjustments, and get the win. To be honest, UK still had plenty to bust the game open. It just didn’t have enough to sustain it. Or maybe, this is part of the learning process for these Cats. Lets face it, these guys aren’t used to having big leads on good teams.

To be honest, Meeks didn’t have a real good day but the hustle on offense was there. The D end? I thought he really stunk it up. Vandy did a lot of moving picks. UK (ie: Meeks) did a horrible job of staying close to his man as they moved and the picks came so late that it didn’t even matter. And when I say close, I mean he usually trailed his guy by four or five steps. Totally unacceptable..

But on to the good news. No, on to the absolute greatest of news, and it can be summed up in one word. Liggins. He was the difference maker. Not in the whole game, mind you, but in the second half. It reminded me of the year UK woke up at the half during Vandy and played an unrelenting finish up to NCAA tournament time. The spearhead then was Hawkins and the spear head this time was Liggins. In this game, we got to see what a difference Liggins can make when he plays stunning D, within the team concept, and looks to make others better. In the process of making others looked better, HE looked like an All Freshman candidate. The kicker? He did it scoring all of one point. The 20 point lead came as a direct result of his second half play. I also thought Miller looked much better and his rebounds were key. With both Patterson and Stevenson no where to be found on the boards, the others, including Miller did just enough to almost even out the rebounding battle. But if Liggins can give 20 quality minutes, UK would take one of the questions going in to the year and place a huge SOLVED stamp on it. I can certainly see Porter starting, Liggins in middle relief, and Porter closing as a huge weapon going forward if Liggins did, in fact, figure it out in the second half of Vandy.

I was worried about Vandy. UK hangs its hat on playing smart and so does Vandy. Sometimes these type games come down to who plays the smartest. So even when I heard Ogilvy would be out I was worried. And the way UK left guys open for 3s early was exactly what I was worried about. But UK adjusted and I thought the D, minus Meeks, was very good after the adjustments.

Now its on to the ugliest team in the league (country?). Their colors are ugly, their players are ugly, their house is an ugly Rupp knock off, their coach is butt ugly and their cheerleaders are ugly. Most importantly, their play is ugly. It’s sad when the best looking thing about your program is your hound dog mascot. It’s really really sad. Anyway, it’s time for Patterson to clock back in and go to work simply because UK is simply much prettier.

UK 71 UL 74

January 5, 2009 by  
Filed under Basketball

In the end, it came down to one shot. UL was in the position to take the shot, and Sosa was able to hit the shot. That was probably the only thing that separates this UK team from this UL team at this point in the season.

Along the way, UK had many chances to either prove they were better or show they were not. And through the game, UK did its best at to prove both and Meeks is the finest of examples. His start to the game was nothing short of horrid. He was pressing too much and you could tell his mind was racing 90 miles a minute. He has GOT to find a way to calm himself down in these bigger games. UK just isn’t the type of team that can recover from a hole of the likes that Meeks put UK in at the start. To UK and Meeks credit, they did fight, scratch and claw to within 3 at the half, only to allow UL to punch them in the mouth at the start of the second half. Again, to their credit, UK fought and clawed to a draw at the 2-3 second mark.

So what did we learn from this game? First, this team will not give up. Next, Porter really is proving to be the leader of this team. He handled the pressure with ease on his way to a zero turn over day while also adding 8 points. You would like to see his assist total up more, but you could also easily credit UL for taking away the assist areas and making UK’s scorers get theirs on their own. The one mistake Porter made on the day was by far the biggest. You simply do not give a guy with the ball room when the clock is under five seconds. You just do not do it. We learned that UK’s frosh are still not quite ready for prime time. Liggins continues to remind me of jet the reindeer in Santa Claus II. Miller continues to think too much. Harrelson fell down big time in this game and Stewart continued to improve in very limited action. Galloway might be the biggest mystery, but the answer to why he only saw four minutes may be at the defensive end. While it was great getting major minutes from Harris again, he certainly didn’t tear it up on either end himself. As for offense, it looks like Patterson and Meeks will be carrying this team just like Bradley and Crawford carried UK last year down the stretch. And I think that will be enough if UK can shore up its defense, which I think still has the most room for improvement.

Now, it’s on to the most important part of the season. Every game now has season defining implications and UK will need to bring it every game. And I think UK is ready. Last year at this time, I didn’t think they were even close to ready. So with that said, I think this team is light years ahead of where they were at this time last year. IF they can improve as much as they did from this point forward last year, things could be getting in the real special area very soon.

Mid Season Review

December 30, 2008 by  
Filed under Basketball

The UK mens basketball program has reached the end of its 2008 schedule. So lets take a look at where they started through where they are today…

The preseason started with as much question as promise. UK had several highly rated new comers and was returning some quality players. But UK was also losing a huge chunk of its scoring and leadership. Off season surgery also placed major question marks on both of its returning marguee players. Meeks was cleared much earlier than Patterson, so he was easily much further along but still was not his old self. There was a point in one of the preseason events (I think it was the Blue White game) that made me sit up a bit on the edge of my seat. it seemed like a small funny thing to most, but I certainly didn’t think it was funny and felt it may be a sign of things to come. Patterson, who is and always has been THE man child, went up for a certain slam only to get rejected by… the front of the rim. I knew right then he wasn’t full strength and he obviously did not have the explosion or lift he displayed last year. The preseason, otherwise, went off without a hitch but then something happened. The season started. And not just against your typical patzy. VMI may have looked like a patzy on the surface, but once you looked deeper you saw something very scary. You saw a high scoring team that played pressure D going against a UK team that had all new roles in three of the four spots on the floor and the most glaring was the point (OK, lead) and it was a recipe for disater. The sky fell and hell opened it doors to the doomed. Ok , maybe not but those who would do anything to undermine this staff revelled in the glory that was a season opening loss. Luckily, the sky did not fall, hell did not open and it turns out all UK needed to do was get better.

And better they did get. Little by little, and bit by bit, UK got better and better with each day. Yes, there was a loss to UNC (who has not lost that has played them), yes there was another loss to a very big and talented Miami team. But there were also wins against K ST, West Virgina and host of other gritty teams, with some real yawners thrown in. So at the close of 2008, UK stands at 11-3. Of those three losses, all are to top 100 teams (yes, VMI is in the 80s), two are to top 50 teams (Miami has even been a top 25 team) and one was to the best team in the land. UK has answered the scoring question easily by turning Meeks lose, getting Patterson back to full strength, and using its third scorer which is a hybrid of Harrelson, Stevenson, Liggins, Stewart, Porter, Slone and Miller, to the tune of 80 something points a game. UK has also found its D when needed by only allowing teams to score in the 60s on average. That is a 20 point or so differential which includes the three losses. The bottom line: This team has gotten better and better every day. And one by one the questions of the preseason have been replaced with answers. The answers were not always the ones people thought they would be. People sometimes have a hard time when that happens. Many thought the answer at the point would be Liggins. Turns out it was Porter. The question of depth would be answered, many thought, by Harrelson and Miller. Turns out its more like Galloway, Slone and Stewart. Many of those people say that you can’t win in big games with guys like Porter and Slone. I say if the other options were able to get it done by now, they would have been able to do it in the gimmi games. How can anyone with a sane mind say that Liggins is a better choice against UL when he isn’t the better choice against App St? That just makes no sense to me at all…

So, now that we have taken a look at the season to date, what are some of the questions moving forward? Is Patterson fully recovered? I say that question was answered when he left from the second block and posterized the poor kid from App St. THAT was the first NBA quality move I have seen in a UK jersey since Prince was taking off from outside the lane for his patented sky dunks. Who will be the third scorer is ALWAYS the question. I think it will contiune to be by committee and I really like it that way. That shows a team is able to mesh and mold around what others are trying to take away. When you have a set third scorer, it makes scouting a little easier. When you have six or seven guys that can each step up when the game plan calls for it, it make it impossible to scout or defend. Can the cats continue to play well with the likes of Porter and Slone? I say they better, or others need to really step it up. I hope its both. The more buttons coach has to push, the better. But I do think Porter and Slone are carving their own nitch on this team. Watch out if Liggins and Miller start doing the same. What about the three spot? I have no clue who will take the lead there. It could be Galloway. It could be Harris. It could very well be Miller if he starts playing more and thinking less. But I think all three will continue to contribute provided Harris recovers. What about the post? I think that is becoming very well defined. Patterson is back to where he was last year, but what if he has matured and is even better? This is a very real possibility. I think it is actually likely. If you think about it, this is an infinately better passing team and with the improved play around him, Patterson’s limit is, well, limitless. Couple that with a guy like Stevenson who is a great complement to him, and then throw in the added support provided by a very skilled Harrelson and an ever improving Stewart, the post seems to be very well manned for the final stretch. So here’s the big question: What should we expext from the home stretch? I have no idea how far this team can go as of yet, but I do not think it is even close to reaching it’s potential. But I am really excited that the answers to all of these questions begins in earnest come January 4th. I say bring on the Cards and..

GO CATS!

UK 84 UCM 52

December 30, 2008 by  
Filed under Basketball

UK had been chewing up teams and spitting them out like spent bubble yum. Wait, MEEKS had been chewing up teams and spitting them out like spent bubble yum. He can obviously streak into orbit at any moment. Be he could also be grounded at any time as well. So the big question for me during that stretch was how will this team perform once Meeks returned to earth? Granted, a return to earth for Meeks is getting 23…

The answer? The team did just fine. Led by a pesky point in Porter and some extremely high quality minutes from Slone, UK has passed the test with flying colors. Some say might say it was against a 3-8 (now 3-9) undermanned team. True, but that doesn’t tell the whole story about this team. If you look a little deeper, you see the worst this team has done was a 14 point loss to Marquette. Yes, this team has lost, but they have been there in all their games. They were in all the games until they met the Cats, that is. The Chips came out and showed a ton of heart. heart is about all they had and sometimes it can carry a team a long way. But this UK team has a ton of heart as well. So when heart meets heart, and UK has Patterson, UK wins easily.

Slone the one hit wonder?  I think not!

Slone the one hit wonder? I think not!

With all the attention given to Porter and Slone’s play, one little tid bit that is flying under the radar is a major accomplishment by Liggins. The fine young man got his first start in the Chips game and played much better than he has of late. Liggins short coming have all been of the above the shoulders type. Last night he seemed to play with an added focus and wasn’t the huge liability on D that he has been to this point. And these were the type of players that could give him problems. Most assumed Liggins and Miller would have left the Porters and the Slones in their dust by now. I think its more a tribute to Porter and Slone than a knock on Liggins or Miller that they have not. As for Porter, he had his best game ever as a Cat against the Chips. Not only did he provide his customary stick to D, but he also distributed OK (not great), added some needed long range daggers, and scored on the break to the tune of 12. More than anything else, though, Porter is providing the visual and spoken leadership the team desperately needed.

Overall I give this team a B+ for their performance. Now, ready or not, it’s on to the Cards!

UK 67 UM 73

December 7, 2008 by  
Filed under Basketball

Comments Off

POP. That was the sound of UM doing to UK what Porter and Harris did to each other out in Vegas. UM hit UK hard and UK never knew what hit them. UM could do whatever it wanted early and get whatever shot they wanted, and UK had to settle for whatever shot UM allowed them to take. Hindsight is a coach’s worst enemy, especially after a tough loss. Should he start two freshmen? I’m not saying because I don’t know. I do know the one he did start was so lost coming out of the gate that there were times he didn’t even know who he was supposed to be guarding through the entire possessions back to back. Not once, but twice. In a row. So does a coach double that risk at the start of a game? Hindsight says yes. Hindsight is always right because it can never be proven wrong.

In my view, two things stand out more than anything else. Harris would have been where he was supposed to be and Miller did not get the luxury of seeing it done first as he usually does. Each game is a brand new set of circumstances and variables. Guys were totally out of sync because of having to give help at times they were not supposed to have to give help and Porter was having to guard a guy he had no business guarding. It took a half, and some adjustments, but UK finally did get in sync on the defensive end. Too little too late? I say no. Even with getting popped from the start and being out of sync, UK could have easily withstood the UM pop if it had done the second thing, and that is to shoot a decent percentage, especially from the outside. Meeks had a horrid offensive game. If the normal percentage of his outside shots go down, it opens up several other things and UK may have never dug a hole anywhere near what it did. Meeks needs to understand one thing. This team needs him and he needs to rise up and meet the challenge. That is what winners do. That is what UK does.

Liggins takes a shot in UKs loss to UM

Liggins takes a shot in UK's loss to UM

This was a tough loss. UK was as good as UM if not maybe even a little better. UM was more experienced and this time experience won out. So is their anything good that can be taken from this loss? I think so! UK will not be this inexperienced in a few more games. The upside for UK is huge. Soon it will not be a question of putting two frosh out there at the start if needed. They will be semi sophs. One of them, Liggins, is growing up right before our eyes and you have to love the kid’s heart. UK never gave up and did fight back. No ifs about it. But UK could have easily came all the way back and could have easily won this game IF they hit their shots late, even after not hitting them early. The kids need to understand that just because you didn’t hit your shots in the possessions before, it doesn’t mean you can’t hit them in the possessions coming up.

So where does UK go from here? Well, I think the very best thing to do is to get back in the saddle and do it again. And that is just what UK will do today. I think this back to back game set is a great idea. Plus UK will have little time to think about the UM loss. It will hopefully be a game where UK can put hindsight in the rear view mirror.

UK 103 Lamar 61

December 4, 2008 by  
Filed under Basketball

Comments Off

UK dispatched the Lamar Cardinals in what was easily there best performance of the year. The problem: There are so many story lines that I don’t know where to begin. Do I start with the Liggins, Galloway, Stewart coming out party? After all, this is the night UK fans have been waiting for from all three. Liggins was in total control, displayed the ability to get UK into its sets, DIDN’T FORCE THE ACTION and maybe most importantly, knocked down the outside shots UK desperately needs from anyone other than Meeks. Galloway showed us that uncanny passing ability with some of the most excellent assists on the night. He also immediately showed us why he hasn’t played as much when he allowed his guy to get past him. I harp on keeping someone in front all the time, but I don’t think it can be harped on enough because usually so many bad things happen. In this case, not only did Lamar get a great look, they also got an offensive rebound and the second foul on Patterson. But having said all that, he did a fantastic job after that. Kudos to coach for sticking with him because it was easy to see the value he will bring when the rubber meets the road. Stewart also provided some of his most productive minutes ever as a Cat. He has an awesome baseline jumper game which can be a zone killer down the stretch. And UK can expect to see a lot of zone if some shooters do not come to the surface.

Harris and Porter being attended to by the UK medical staff.

Harris and Porter being attended to by the UK medical staff as Coach looks on.

But maybe I should start with the reason those guys got extended looks. The scene was something from a nightmare. Harris and Porter were down and neither looked good. At least Porter looked like he was able to function. Harris, not so much. We now find out that the medical staff took added precautions after Harris told them he had shooting pains running through his neck. The injury is not thought to be serious but we really do not know for sure at this point. This is a horrible way to get minutes. I read some things were so called fans were “glad” about this. Not only are they less than fans, they are less than human. Sick, disturbed, mentally deformed and out of touch with any sense of reality come to mind when I think of such people. All I can say is you will get yours on judgment day because there is no way you can make comments like that and have a chance at passing on hell. Of course our thoughts and prayers are with both players and it is my deepest wish that they recover, like, now. Not for the sake of the team, but for their and their family’s sake. This is when something is much bigger than the game in my book.

Maybe the big news was the turnover turn around. Silly me, I knew this was a pesky, quick, experienced team which is just the type that has given UK fits. Win or lose, I thought this was the exact type of team UK needed to play. UK has demons and turnovers, especially to these type teams, is demon number one. But to UK’s credit, they did exactly what Coach wanted. I don’t think Lamar wanted to come back out after the first half because UK looked sharp and was taking care of the ball while causing Lamar all kinds of problems. I am not going to nit pick on the rebounding; yet. UK has rebounded better and I think/hope last night was an anomaly. Many of those boards were of the long/weird bounce kind and those can really skew the numbers.

For once, the main story line isn’t the 31 point effort from Patterson or the 19 and 6 assists with only one turnover from Meeks, right?

I suppose I will defer to you to decide the story line order of the day. While making your selections, please also include Stevenson’s reemergence, especially in the mid range game, there was a Carter sighting, and Miller struggled a little.

So all this begs the question: What does this game tell us? I honestly do not think it tells us much of anything. UK is better at this point than they were last year at this point. But I think Vegas told us that. UK does have potential on the bench. But that potential doesn’t mean a hill of beans if that potential isn’t realized game in and game out. Even though Patterson has scored well in most games, I still do not think he is playing as well as he could be. I need to see the same game from Meeks a few in a row and the same can be said for Liggins, Galloway, Stewart and Stevenson. The one real constant, in my mind is a guy I haven’t even said a word about and it may be the biggest story of the year. Let’s hear it for Jorts!

UK Takes the Vegas Invitational

November 30, 2008 by  
Filed under Basketball

Comments Off

Not much of it was pretty. Not much at all. Meeks, maybe. A nice play here and a nice play there. But over all it was quite the ugly two games. But that doesn’t really matter much today as long as its two wins. Maybe its the best of both worlds. Lots of tape on what UK needs to work on while putting up W’s is any coach’s dream. We also got a very good understanding of where UK is today. They are a little bit better than good but not spectacular teams in K State and WVU. They could be a lot better if they understood how valuable the basketball is. They could be top 25 if they understood that its better to make a safe pass for an assist rather than a difficult one. And I don’t think you can really point to to the point and say that is where the problems lay. Maybe better point play would stem some of the sloppiness, but the carelessness is across the board. It also doesn’t help that 2 Pat is alternating great games with below sub par ones. But clearly, the turnovers are costing UK. The story becomes very clear when you see that in similar minutes, a freshman wing player, Miller, had fewer turnovers that ALL the returning players from last year. Meeks, 5; 2 Pat, 3, Porter, 4. The only returning player with better numbers is Millers counterpart, Harris, who had zero but that was in 15 minutes of play. Still, it is nice to be able to overcome the sloppy play and win. I must give a shout out to Liggins. While he still frustrates me to no end, he did do a lot of good things down the stretch.

So what must UK do, besides taking care of the basketball, to get get better? UK was 1 of 5 on threes in the WVU game. Someone other that Meeks has got to step up and hit some outside shots. UK also needs to find a way to get Stevenson and 2 Pat going. Both have played well in spurts, but neither have provided the type of play that defined them last year. Stevenson seems to get lost when the focus is on 2 Pat and 2 Pat just isn’t moving well game in and game out. Meeks has given UK a steady offensive player and Harrelson is doing the things Stevenson should be doing, like cleaning up the offensive glass and putting himself in position to take a pass. Miller will come around and Harris is improved and looking to do more. All in all, I think this team can be much better than last once they find their stride. But it may be a while before we will know for sure.

UK vs VMI: Farce or Forewarning?

November 19, 2008 by  
Filed under Basketball

Comments Off

If you didn’t watch it, you missed a jaw dropping game. How can this be the same team that looked so good its first time out? It isn’t possible. The players looked as if they had gelled into a well oiled machine already in mid season form. Then something strange happened. Things didn’t look quite the same the next go round. Where were guys like Harrelson that looked as if he were ready to take UK by storm? Where was the sure ball handling and pin point passing from guys like Porter? Where was 2 Pat period? But, in the end, UK did roll so no worries. I feared that so many things went right in the first outing, the guys wouldn’t have an idea of what could go wrong.
Fast forward to VMI. The exact type of team that gave UK fits last year. They started the game with a 27 foot dagger and hardly let up the entire game. This little bitty team took UK out of everything UK wanted to do. No one, and I mean no one did a thing for UK to change that. The guards were not smart enough to understand what was happening. Meeks was a man but even he played right into VMI’s hands. And Coach seemed to sit on his hands, not knowing what to do. Enough about the game, though. It is over and done.
Or is it? That is the question of the day. If you cruise the message boards you see all the Billy G haters out in all their glory. Most are having a field day with their “We should have never run off Tubby” posts. Billy G lovers are out trying to defend and qualify the loss. Any time you have two extremes, someone is right and some one is wrong, correct? Well, in this case, no. In this case NEITHER is right. There is no way UK is as good as they looked in exhibit A. There is also no way UK is as bad as exhibit C. As is usually the case, the truth is somewhere in between. So where does that leave the questions, “Is Billy G right for UK?” and “Should UK fans have run off Tubby?”
Answering the second is very easy. UK fans did NOT run off Tubby. To be honest, the media did. Tubby was fine with a totally disgruntled fan base as long as the media darlings were saying the fans were ignorant and Tubby was the next best thing to sliced bread. Only when the media started turning, did Tubby feel the heat. But in the end, no matter who gave Tubby the nudge, it was time for a change. Anyone saying otherwise is just plain ignorant.
Answering the first question at this point is impossible. Billy G has worked his tail off. He has been on the cutting edge of recruiting and training. We have seen him take a group of guys that had DOOMED written all over them and shock several top teams. In one case, his team scared the cagibers out of a top 10 team at their place and without his best player. But on the other hand, you have GW and VMI. That should never happen. Some say Tubby would never lose games like that, but they are wrong. People forget UK lost to a Div II team in exhibition play just a few short years ago. Having said that, it wasn’t acceptable then and it is not acceptable now. But just as you can not judge the quality of Billy G based on the excelled play of last year, you can not judge him on the horrid losses. He must adjust. Something must change. But there is one thing we do know about him and that is he will evaluate himself and he will adjust. And that is a welcomed change. As for his worth, we must wait for time to tell.

« Previous Page

Get Adobe Flash player